You may be right. Although, in the more recent porn I've seen, there doesn't seem to be as much attention paid to they guys balls. Now its basically, suck, fuck, fist. Not that that's a bad thing, mind. Also, while the vintage models are in very good shape, it seems like today's models are worked out to within an inch of their lives. Too much waxing, shaving, plucking. A small pubic patch does not make your dick look bigger, it makes you look like a 5 year old. Great post.
BIGGER hair and bigger bushes! LOL!!
ReplyDeleteLOVE the guy in the Peterbilt Tshirt OINK!
ReplyDeleteYes they did, they didn't have all the chemical's in the water, food, etc, that reduced normal testosterone levels.
ReplyDeletejust what I like!!!
ReplyDeleteI just love vintage, they are the best pics.
ReplyDeleteCarol.
Yeh the good ol days for sure! Damn hot men!!
ReplyDeleteI thought they had bigger balls.
ReplyDeleteRay
Love the Vintage Pictures... Bigger balls or not, and fantastic bushes!!! Thanks
ReplyDeleteThey are packing some serious cojones! Always love that PeterBilt dude!
ReplyDeleteYou may be right. Although, in the more recent porn I've seen, there doesn't seem to be as much attention paid to they guys balls. Now its basically, suck, fuck, fist. Not that that's a bad thing, mind. Also, while the vintage models are in very good shape, it seems like today's models are worked out to within an inch of their lives. Too much waxing, shaving, plucking. A small pubic patch does not make your dick look bigger, it makes you look like a 5 year old. Great post.
ReplyDeleteGreat post, Ray!
ReplyDeletethere's much more steroid use today, too. that shrinks the testicles.
ReplyDelete5th is very good!
ReplyDeleteYou had to have balls back then to do the stuff they did, big ones!
ReplyDelete